Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Juan-Carlos Spir vs Naoki Nakagawa Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Spir vs Nakagawa analysis and find out who is favored!
Juan-Carlos Spir vs Naoki Nakagawa Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Spir 1 - 1 Nakagawa
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Spir has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Nakagawa has won 47.52%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Spir, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Nakagawa has won 42.06%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 33.93% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Spir has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nakagawa has saved 65.63% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Spir has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Nakagawa winning 65.91% (W/L 29/ 15) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Spir has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 24/ 19), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3). Nakagawa has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 175/ 109), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 47% (W/L 8/ 9).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Spir winning 1 times and Nakagawa being victorious 1 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Spir winning 2 and Nakagawa winning 2. The last match between Spir and Nakagawa was at the Mexico F14, 07-10-2013, First, Hard with Juan-Carlos Spir getting the victory 6-2 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Spir and Nakagawa have played a deciding set 0 times, with Spir winning 0 times and Nakagawa 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Spir winning 0, and Nakagawa 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Spir has played against opponents with an average rank of while Nakagawa has played against players with an average rank of 182.14.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Spir has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nakagawa has won 53% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Spir has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nakagawa has converted 39.29% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Ret.
Rank
410
High
34
Age
Plays
1
Total1
1
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
438
Rank
334
High
27
Age
R
Plays
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
Form
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
47% (56-63)
Career Total W/L
61% (295-192)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
25% (1-3)
$2,045
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Juan-Carlos Spir | Naoki Nakagawa |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 2 |
| Games Won | 19 | 17 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-3 | |||||
| 6-3 6-4 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Juan-Carlos Spir | Naoki Nakagawa |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 25% (1/3) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 40% (4/6) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 48% (45/48) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 25% (1/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.39 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 18 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.22 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 10 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:52:49 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 112.75 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 52% (154/295) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 70% (108/154) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 48% (67/141) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 39% (11/28) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 37% (110/294) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
Juan-Carlos Spir Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats 
Maik Burlage
Player
Juan-Carlos Spir
76%
(
53 of
70)
1st Serve %
60%
(
34 of
57)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
28 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
73
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 | 3-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Aron Hiltzik
Player
Juan-Carlos Spir
70%
(
51 of
73)
1st Serve %
70%
(
50 of
71)
6
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
25 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
82
Total Points Won
62
|
6-2 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Evan King
Player
Juan-Carlos Spir
54%
(
19 of
35)
1st Serve %
52%
(
23 of
44)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
79%
(
15 of
19)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
12 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
53
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Juan-Carlos Spir
Player
Luca Corinteli
51%
(
38 of
75)
1st Serve %
63%
(
51 of
81)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
14
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
28 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
81)
84
Total Points Won
72
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Munoz-De La Nava
Player
Juan-Carlos Spir
54%
(
29 of
54)
1st Serve %
55%
(
31 of
56)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
90%
(
26 of
29)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
24 of
31)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
13 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
20 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hugo Dellien
Player
Juan-Carlos Spir
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
62)
0
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
6
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
27%
(
18 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
74
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 | 7-6(4) 4-6 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Naoki Nakagawa Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Gastao Elias
Player
Naoki Nakagawa
57%
(
61 of
107)
1st Serve %
52%
(
66 of
128)
3
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
6
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
44 of
66)
54%
(
25 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
19%
(
3 of
16)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
40%
(
43 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
57 of
128)
121
Total Points Won
114
|
7-6(4) 5-7 4-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Naoki Nakagawa
Player
Gianmarco Ferrari
55%
(
24 of
44)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
92%
(
22 of
24)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
55
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Rigele Te
Player
Naoki Nakagawa
55%
(
49 of
89)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
71)
9
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
63%
(
25 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
36%
(
32 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
71)
87
Total Points Won
73
|
4-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Naoki Nakagawa
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
46%
(
24 of
52)
5
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
18 of
24)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Naoki Nakagawa
53%
(
46 of
86)
1st Serve %
62%
(
61 of
99)
10
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
1
83%
(
38 of
46)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
44 of
61)
60%
(
24 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
24 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
37 of
99)
99
Total Points Won
86
|
6-2 6-7(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andres Martin
Player
Naoki Nakagawa
65%
(
50 of
77)
1st Serve %
64%
(
58 of
90)
10
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
35%
(
27 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
32 of
90)
82
Total Points Won
85
|
7-6(5) 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Naoki Nakagawa
Player
Mathys Erhard
61%
(
48 of
79)
1st Serve %
64%
(
58 of
90)
1
Aces
9
6
Double Faults
1
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
33%
(
26 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
90)
89
Total Points Won
80
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Naoki Nakagawa
Player
Yusuke Takahashi
52%
(
42 of
81)
1st Serve %
73%
(
67 of
92)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
39 of
67)
59%
(
23 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
36%
(
29 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
39 of
92)
91
Total Points Won
82
|
7-5 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Blake Ellis
Player
Naoki Nakagawa
50%
(
52 of
104)
1st Serve %
54%
(
58 of
108)
6
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
6
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
42 of
58)
56%
(
29 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
20 of
50)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
35%
(
36 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
46 of
108)
114
Total Points Won
98
|
6-2 6-7(6) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Shintaro Mochizuki
Player
Naoki Nakagawa
47%
(
23 of
49)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
70)
5
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
2
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
35 of
70)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Spir Vs Nakagawa Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
